The National Enquirer reports, “Robert Pattinson, about to shoot steamy ‘Breaking Dawn’ honeymoon scenes with real-life honey Kristen Stewart in Brazil, started shaking, panicking and actually tearing up just before cameras rolled for the ultra-violent sex session where he nearly crushes his new bride with his superhuman vampire strength and leaves her badly battered and bruised.”
Really?
According to the tab, Pattinson pleaded, “Can’t we use body doubles? Kristen is so slight… I can’t stand the thought of hurting her!”
The Enquirer says Pattinson ultimately “shot the crucial scene [after] she assured him she was okay,” but later “freaked” when Stewart showed him “bruises” that makeup artists painted on her body.
“For an instant, Rob thought the bruises were real,” claims the mag, adding that he “started stammering, ‘Oh no, what have I done?… Baby, I’m so sorry!”
Stewart, says the Enquirer, then began to laugh as Pattinson was on the verge of melting down.
First, the mag’s article is a tad insulting to Pattinson. His alleged asking for “body doubles” and fear of “hurting her” basically implies he couldn’t act out the scene – which, of course, he did quite ably.
More importantly, this NEVER happened.
Sources on the set say Pattinson knew exactly what was called for in the scene, and executed it perfectly.
It’s also absurd to think that Pattinson wouldn’t know that Stewart was going to have makeup applied in an effort to give the appearance of bruises after the sex scene.
An on-set source tells Gossip Cop that the Enquirer’s entire premise is “patently false,” and that it’s about as real as Stewart’s “bruises” were.
Gossipcop
Showing posts with label gossipcop. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gossipcop. Show all posts
Friday, November 26, 2010
Tuesday, November 2, 2010
Robert Pattinson Was Not “Denied” Haunted Plantation Halloween Party
According to the site, Robert Pattinson “had big plans for Halloween and it involved inviting the entire cast of Breaking Dawn to one of the most haunted places in the world,” namely, Myrtles Plantation in Louisiana.
But, reports HollywoodLife, the cast “couldn’t get the haunted house of their dreams.”
That would be awfully disappointing… if it were actually true.
Kristen Stewart, who “wanted to spend Halloween” at Myrtles, was actually in Los Angeles over the weekend, as were other cast members like Peter Facinelli.
Ashley Greene happened to be in South America.
So it seems rather unlikely that Pattinson planned to have “the entire cast” over to the plantation, since “the entire cast” wasn’t even in Louisiana and supposed co-host Stewart was thousands of miles away.
What “evidence” does HollywoodLife have?
The site quotes a Myrtles rep as saying, “Someone called us up and asked if we were available anytime during Halloween weekend” and “said it would be for members of the Breaking Dawn cast.”
So “someone” — never identified — may have called the plantation and mentioned that Breaking Dawn wanted to have a party there.
That’s a FAR cry from Robert Pattinson getting “DENIED!”
“I don’t know about it,” an employee who’s worked there for eight straight days told Gossip Cop. She even heard the venue’s manager describe the Pattinson rumor as “blown out of proportion.”
Follow @GossipCop on Twitter for accurate celebrity news!
Wednesday, September 22, 2010
CLAIM: Robert Pattinson’s Agent Has Come Between Him and Kristen Stewart
GossipCop
It’s “Dark Times for ‘Twilight’ Couple’” Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart, threatens an ominous headline in this week’s National Enquirer.
Uh-oh.
Even darker than the tense hours after Pattinson was allegedly almost killed by an elephant, as the same tabloid recently reported?
This time, according to the Enquirer, his relationship with Stewart is “on the rocks,” because she “has become resentful of [Pattinson's] friendship with his much older agent Stephanie Ritz.”
Seriously.
This is how desperate the magazines have become.
They’ve failed to accurately link Pattinson to a long list of other women. They’ve been unable to prove that his relationship with Stewart is as shaky as they claim it is.
The couple stays together, month after month.
So the Enquirer is forced to imply that Pattinson’s agent has come between him and Stewart.
“Rob and Stephanie have always been close, and Kristen is uncomfortable with it,” a “pal” tells the tab.
Then the tab goes on to describe how Pattinson spends a lot of time with Ritz.
Since this ridiculousness will certainly be picked up by the Enquirer’s usual copycats, let Gossip Cop introduce some sanity.
Robert Pattinson is often with his agent because she’s his agent.
Kristen Stewart, who knows a thing or two about Hollywood, understands this.
Why doesn’t the Enquirer?
It’s “Dark Times for ‘Twilight’ Couple’” Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart, threatens an ominous headline in this week’s National Enquirer.
Uh-oh.
Even darker than the tense hours after Pattinson was allegedly almost killed by an elephant, as the same tabloid recently reported?
This time, according to the Enquirer, his relationship with Stewart is “on the rocks,” because she “has become resentful of [Pattinson's] friendship with his much older agent Stephanie Ritz.”
Seriously.
This is how desperate the magazines have become.
They’ve failed to accurately link Pattinson to a long list of other women. They’ve been unable to prove that his relationship with Stewart is as shaky as they claim it is.
The couple stays together, month after month.
So the Enquirer is forced to imply that Pattinson’s agent has come between him and Stewart.
“Rob and Stephanie have always been close, and Kristen is uncomfortable with it,” a “pal” tells the tab.
Then the tab goes on to describe how Pattinson spends a lot of time with Ritz.
Since this ridiculousness will certainly be picked up by the Enquirer’s usual copycats, let Gossip Cop introduce some sanity.
Robert Pattinson is often with his agent because she’s his agent.
Kristen Stewart, who knows a thing or two about Hollywood, understands this.
Why doesn’t the Enquirer?
Tuesday, September 21, 2010
Robert Pattinson Visits Kristen Stewart; Site Panics and Flip Flops
Remember those “Sesame Street” shorts that would teach us the differences between opposites, like “hot” versus “cold” or “up” versus “down”?
HollywoodLife must not have paid too much attention.
Once again we visit the site’s alternate universe of blatant contradictions.
Last month, HollywoodLife bemoaned the “string of bad luck” Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart experienced with (supposed) bad timing.
Their “hellacious work schedules” were “keeping them apart,” claimed the site. After all, Stewart was beginning to film On the Road, while Pattinson was supposedly “tackling” Unbound Captives, meaning he had “no free time” to spend with her.
Gossip Cop pointed out that there actually was no start date for Unbound Captives, that Pattinson would have many chances to see Stewart, and that HollywoodLife just wanted to create some drama where there was absolutely none..
Fast forward to today.
“It’s a good thing that Robert Pattinson has so much free time on his hands, because that means he’s able to visit girlfriend Kristen Stewart at work whenever he pleases!” declares HollywoodLife.
Seriously.
That’s what the site now “reports,” based on an “insider.”
Somehow or another, according to HollywoodLife, Pattinson has “no free time” yet “so much free time.”
Those look like complete opposite premises to us.
Reality would probably be so frustrating for HollywoodLife… if it didn’t think of it as negotiable.
Follow @GossipCop on Twitter for accurate celebrity news!
HollywoodLife must not have paid too much attention.
Once again we visit the site’s alternate universe of blatant contradictions.
Last month, HollywoodLife bemoaned the “string of bad luck” Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart experienced with (supposed) bad timing.
Their “hellacious work schedules” were “keeping them apart,” claimed the site. After all, Stewart was beginning to film On the Road, while Pattinson was supposedly “tackling” Unbound Captives, meaning he had “no free time” to spend with her.
Gossip Cop pointed out that there actually was no start date for Unbound Captives, that Pattinson would have many chances to see Stewart, and that HollywoodLife just wanted to create some drama where there was absolutely none..
Fast forward to today.
“It’s a good thing that Robert Pattinson has so much free time on his hands, because that means he’s able to visit girlfriend Kristen Stewart at work whenever he pleases!” declares HollywoodLife.
Seriously.
That’s what the site now “reports,” based on an “insider.”
Somehow or another, according to HollywoodLife, Pattinson has “no free time” yet “so much free time.”
Those look like complete opposite premises to us.
Reality would probably be so frustrating for HollywoodLife… if it didn’t think of it as negotiable.
Follow @GossipCop on Twitter for accurate celebrity news!
Thursday, September 16, 2010
Why ": New Moon" made it into the Guinness World Records book →
Guinness also awarded The Twilight Saga: New Moon the title of Highest Opening-Day Gross. It earned $72.7 million on its first day, beating previous record holder The Dark Knight.
Read FULL ARTICLE HERE~
GossipCop
Friday, September 10, 2010
Heat Mag is a “Slave” to Lame Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart Stories
Heat magazine has a sterling track record when it comes to reporting on Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson.
After all, the tabloid once insisted that Stewart was living a miserable “nightmare” (not so much) and printed an “exclusive” photo of Pattinson sleeping on the Tube in London (oh, wait, that was faked).
On cue, a so-called “source” provides this gem of a quote: “She’s like, ‘I love Rob, but I love my dogs, too.’”
Weirdly, some sites picking up the rumor try to connect it with the notion that Pattinson is “possessive” of Stewart. Somehow, by supposedly treating Pattinson like a “servant,” Stewart breaks his hold on her.
Here’s what seems more likely: Outlets are replacing their debunked claims that Pattinson is controlling with equally lame assertions that Stewart is controlling.
Maybe Heat should “master” the fine art of accurate reporting before (badly) playing amateur relationship counselor.
Follow @GossipCop on Twitter for accurate celebrity news!

Now Heat is exploring the pair’s relationship — and has concluded that Pattinson is more like Stewart’s “slave” than her boyfriend.
(shaking head)After a gratuitous dig at Stewart, whom the mag describes as “famed for her below average acting abilities,” Heat claims the actress “treats her hunky beau like an assistant, often sending him out to buy booze and food.”
On cue, a so-called “source” provides this gem of a quote: “She’s like, ‘I love Rob, but I love my dogs, too.’”
Weirdly, some sites picking up the rumor try to connect it with the notion that Pattinson is “possessive” of Stewart. Somehow, by supposedly treating Pattinson like a “servant,” Stewart breaks his hold on her.
Here’s what seems more likely: Outlets are replacing their debunked claims that Pattinson is controlling with equally lame assertions that Stewart is controlling.
Maybe Heat should “master” the fine art of accurate reporting before (badly) playing amateur relationship counselor.
Follow @GossipCop on Twitter for accurate celebrity news!
Sunday, September 5, 2010
GossipCop clears up more Robsten nonsense!
Today we’re wondering what happens when HollywoodLife editors visit the dentist.
On the one hand, they’re so numb to reality that Novocaine is probably unnecessary. But at the same time, they spout so much drivel, it has to be tough for the hygienist get a good look.

.HollywoodLife claims Pattinson is “freaking out” about Stewart’s “sex scenes” with On The Road co-star Viggo Mortensen.Supposedly, the Twilight actor is so “worried about hanky panky going on during his girlfriend’s racy scenes with Viggo” that he plans to hang around the set all the time.“There are a lot of sex scenes including a threesome, and Rob wants to make sure that it’s all pretend from the start and finish of the film,” claims a HollywoodLife “insider.”In fact, the source adds, “He didn’t like that Kristen was even considering taking this role,” noting that as Pattinson branches out from Edward Cullen “he didn’t take on a role as risque as hers.”
Good grief. [shaking head] Where to begin?
For one thing, Stewart’s Marylou Moriarty character in On The Road is not involved in a string of racy scenes.That’s kind of an important point HollywoodLife should note.
Also, Pattinson actually is taking on a rather sexual role in Bel Ami, not that Stewart or anyone else is “freaking out.”
Unlike the gang at HollywoodLife, Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart are adult professionals, not children. They’re quite aware that love scenes are “pretend.”
Another observation: If Pattinson didn’t spend time on Stewart’s set, HollywoodLife would probably use his absence to start a rumor that he was jealous of Mortensen and upset about their relationship. No matter what he or Stewart do, the site will find some way of twisting it into nonsense.
We’re no dentists, but it’s pretty clear that HollywoodLife bites.
Thanks for aways clearing up stupid rumors like these!
XoXo!
Saturday, August 28, 2010
ROBERT PATTINSON NOT SET FOR JOLIE MOVIE ‘UNFORGIVEN’
Reports emerged yesterday that Angelina Jolie will develop a film based on a BBC miniseries called Unforgiven. The potential project would grow from the same partnership behind Jolie’s upcoming Bosnian War movie.
Now rumors are buzzing that Robert Pattinson is also attached to Unforgiven.
“There’s speculation in the wind that Robert Pattinson has been tapped for this project,” reports Lainey Gossip. The actor met late last year with Jolie attorney Robert Offer, observes the site, “so his recent trip to see [her movie] Salt with his agent is suddenly rife with new possibility.”
While it’s always possible a high-profile actor like Pattinson could join Unforgiven — especially, as the site notes, to demonstrate his range — as of now, he is not involved.
A Pattinson insider tells Gossip Cop that rumors connecting him to the film are inaccurate.
Gossip Cop will follow all developments.
via
Now rumors are buzzing that Robert Pattinson is also attached to Unforgiven.
“There’s speculation in the wind that Robert Pattinson has been tapped for this project,” reports Lainey Gossip. The actor met late last year with Jolie attorney Robert Offer, observes the site, “so his recent trip to see [her movie] Salt with his agent is suddenly rife with new possibility.”
While it’s always possible a high-profile actor like Pattinson could join Unforgiven — especially, as the site notes, to demonstrate his range — as of now, he is not involved.
A Pattinson insider tells Gossip Cop that rumors connecting him to the film are inaccurate.
Gossip Cop will follow all developments.
via
Friday, August 27, 2010
Logic Behind Kristen Stewart “Jealous” Item Collapses
We’ve tried to follow the logic here, but it just makes us dizzy.
On Tuesday, a magazine story picked up by Showbiz Spy reported that Kristen Stewart had suffered a “breakdown” in Montreal.
Supposedly, the turmoil came about because the actress “can’t handle” her fame and “refused” to go to the Teen Choice Awards. She “didn’t want to have to face the media spotlight yet again,” alleged the report.
The so-called “breakdown” was, of course, nonsense.
Flash forward two days.
“Kristen Stewart is jealous of her Twilight costar Ashley Greene!” bellows Showbiz Spy
Um, ok.
And what’s the explanation for this alleged jealousy?
“Sources say Kristen is furious that Ashley has been getting so much positive praise during promotional tours,” claims the site. According to one so-called “insider,” “Ashley has turned out to be the real favorite with Twilight fans.”
Leaving aside that bizarre assertion, how can the same site claim that Stewart hates the media spotlight so much she’s skipping appearances and is insanely jealous of the attention the media gives to one of her co-stars?
Here’s food for thought: Doesn’t it seem like the media is a LOT more obsessed with Kristen Stewart’s opinion of it than the other way around?
GossipCop
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
Robert Pattinson’s Supposed Elephant Accident De-Trunked

At least that’s what one story claims.
Pattinson “almost died while shooting his new movie Water for Elephants!” cries a Showbiz Spy item based on the National Enquirer.
Whoa.
What (supposedly) happened?
Rosie, a 9,000-pound elephant, “tossed Rob off her back — and nearly rolled over him” while they filmed a scene in which Pattinson gives the animal a bath while talking with Reese Witherspoon’s character.
“The script called for the elephant to step forward while swinging her trunk from side to side, but Rosie got her signals mixed up,” according to a so-called “source.”
“Instead, she sat down on her big butt, lifted her front legs — then rolled over,” continues the Enquirer.
“Before anyone could react, Robert slid right down the elephant’s back. It could have been a disaster if she’d rolled over on him — but he got lucky, landing face first in a pile of dirt and mud. He was filthy, but unharmed.”
Well, if anyone knows about falling into filth, it’d be the National Enquirer.
But while the Rosie & Robert incident is dramatic — it’s 100% false.
A source close to Pattinson tells Gossip Cop the supposed elephant near-disaster is “untrue.”
Tusk tusk, Enquirer.
Follow @GossipCop on Twitter for accurate celebrity news!
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
Bogus Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson “Breakdown”
After a few days of invasive Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart coverage, it’s nice to see outlets getting back to good old-fashioned wrong reporting.
According to a British magazine Showbiz Spy cites, Pattinson’s recent visit to Montreal was meant to help Stewart get through a “breakdown.”
An anonymous “source” for the tabloid claims Stewart “can’t handle” her fame and “refused to go to this year’s Teen Choice Awards.”
“She’s filming On The Road in Montreal and could have gone,” continues the mag, “but didn’t want to have to face the media spotlight yet again.” Supposedly, Pattinson “knew that she was going through a hard time,” and flew immediately to Canada to “boost her spirits.”
Oh, but the magazine insists this “crisis” has been going for a long time. Its source alleges Stewart “has been at the breaking point ever since they finished filming Eclipse.”
Let’s all take some deep breaths and return to reality.
Kristen Stewart did not have a “breakdown.”
While it’s true that Stewart didn’t attend the Teen Choice Awards because of On The Road obligations, it’s just as true that she’s routinely made appearances in the months since Eclipse closed production. In fact, she presented a preview of that very film at the MTV Movie Awards.
Stewart has been in the public eye for years. Her discomfort with some aspects of celebrity is well documented, but that’s all it is: discomfort. There was no sudden panic while shooting On The Road. There was no cross-continent rescue mission for Pattinson.
But tabs feel the need to drum up drama instead of reporting what the Montreal trip actually was — a perfectly happy visit. It’s too bad that crisis sells.
Follow @GossipCop on Twitter for accurate celebrity news!
Check us out on Facebook!
Visit GossipCop.com or the latest!
According to a British magazine Showbiz Spy cites, Pattinson’s recent visit to Montreal was meant to help Stewart get through a “breakdown.”
An anonymous “source” for the tabloid claims Stewart “can’t handle” her fame and “refused to go to this year’s Teen Choice Awards.”
“She’s filming On The Road in Montreal and could have gone,” continues the mag, “but didn’t want to have to face the media spotlight yet again.” Supposedly, Pattinson “knew that she was going through a hard time,” and flew immediately to Canada to “boost her spirits.”
Oh, but the magazine insists this “crisis” has been going for a long time. Its source alleges Stewart “has been at the breaking point ever since they finished filming Eclipse.”
Let’s all take some deep breaths and return to reality.
Kristen Stewart did not have a “breakdown.”
While it’s true that Stewart didn’t attend the Teen Choice Awards because of On The Road obligations, it’s just as true that she’s routinely made appearances in the months since Eclipse closed production. In fact, she presented a preview of that very film at the MTV Movie Awards.
Stewart has been in the public eye for years. Her discomfort with some aspects of celebrity is well documented, but that’s all it is: discomfort. There was no sudden panic while shooting On The Road. There was no cross-continent rescue mission for Pattinson.
But tabs feel the need to drum up drama instead of reporting what the Montreal trip actually was — a perfectly happy visit. It’s too bad that crisis sells.
Follow @GossipCop on Twitter for accurate celebrity news!
Check us out on Facebook!
Visit GossipCop.com or the latest!
Monday, August 16, 2010
‘Breaking Dawn’ Production Schedule Confirmed
Via
Over the past few days, rumors about Breaking Dawn’s production have picked up as filming on the final installment of The Twilight Saga nears.
While some speculation about casting — and alleged “delays” — is far from true, a reported timetable for work on the films is accurate.
A source close to the production confirms to Gossip Cop that filming will begin in November (as we reported last week) and extend until roughly March 15.
Although the expansive nature of Bill Condon’s two-parter (and size of his cast) means there could be minor schedule tweaks, the timetable is set.
Over the past few days, rumors about Breaking Dawn’s production have picked up as filming on the final installment of The Twilight Saga nears.
While some speculation about casting — and alleged “delays” — is far from true, a reported timetable for work on the films is accurate.
A source close to the production confirms to Gossip Cop that filming will begin in November (as we reported last week) and extend until roughly March 15.
Although the expansive nature of Bill Condon’s two-parter (and size of his cast) means there could be minor schedule tweaks, the timetable is set.
Labels:
BreakingDawn,
gossipcop,
KristenStewart,
Movie,
RobertPattinson,
Robsten
Friday, August 6, 2010
Robert Pattinson & Kristen Stewart Not Quitting Movies
We understand that inciting alarm is part of the strategy for bottom-feeding gossip sites, but sometimes it boggles the mind when an outlet with more credibility tries the same trick.
“Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart could be quitting Hollywood,” claims Marie Claire UK.
Wait, “quitting Hollywood”?
“It seems Rob and Kristen could be ready for a more permanent move,” continues the site. “[They're] considering changing their lives to get away from the limelight.”
Pattinson and Stewart’s frustrations with the paparazzi are well-documented, but that’s not even close to a joint decision to quit movies entirely.
A so-called “insider” comes out of nowhere to say the duo want to “get away from stardom,” while “sources” suggest Pattinson and Stewart “might even spend some time treading the boards in the theatre” after The Twilight Saga concludes.
Let’s cut off this nonsense right now.
Robert Pattinson is not quitting Hollywood.
Kristen Stewart is not quitting Hollywood.
Both actors have been able to make smaller-budget movies during the Twilight period.
They’re both filming projects that they happily joined of their own volition this summer.
Neither Pattinson nor Stewart is just waiting for Breaking Dawn to end in order to make some kind of grand escape into the wilderness.
A source close to Stewart said the speculation is totally false, while a Pattinson insider told Gossip Cop the same thing.
Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart are part of an enormous film franchise that turned them into worldwide stars coping with an unrelenting spotlight. But they are not fleeing Hollywood.
Marie Claire and others should know the difference.
Follow @GossipCop on Twitter for accurate celebrity news!
Source
“Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart could be quitting Hollywood,” claims Marie Claire UK.
Wait, “quitting Hollywood”?
“It seems Rob and Kristen could be ready for a more permanent move,” continues the site. “[They're] considering changing their lives to get away from the limelight.”
Pattinson and Stewart’s frustrations with the paparazzi are well-documented, but that’s not even close to a joint decision to quit movies entirely.
A so-called “insider” comes out of nowhere to say the duo want to “get away from stardom,” while “sources” suggest Pattinson and Stewart “might even spend some time treading the boards in the theatre” after The Twilight Saga concludes.
Let’s cut off this nonsense right now.
Robert Pattinson is not quitting Hollywood.
Kristen Stewart is not quitting Hollywood.
Both actors have been able to make smaller-budget movies during the Twilight period.
They’re both filming projects that they happily joined of their own volition this summer.
Neither Pattinson nor Stewart is just waiting for Breaking Dawn to end in order to make some kind of grand escape into the wilderness.
A source close to Stewart said the speculation is totally false, while a Pattinson insider told Gossip Cop the same thing.
Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart are part of an enormous film franchise that turned them into worldwide stars coping with an unrelenting spotlight. But they are not fleeing Hollywood.
Marie Claire and others should know the difference.
Follow @GossipCop on Twitter for accurate celebrity news!
Source
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)